Norada Real Estate Investments

REITs vs. Rental Property: Which is Better for Long-Term Investors?

by

I’ve been investing in real estate for a long time, and if there’s one question I get asked more than any other, it’s this: Should I buy a physical rental property or is it smarter, easier, and just as profitable to stick to Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)? It’s a classic debate, pitting sweat equity against pure financial assets.

For most long-term investors, the ideal strategy isn't choosing between REITs and rental properties, but understanding that REITs offer essential liquidity and passive income while rentals offer superior control and tax benefits, making a combined approach the strongest defensive play.

The choice you make profoundly impacts your lifestyle, your tax bill, and your potential wealth trajectory. Let's dig into the details and figure out which option truly aligns with your personal investment goals, your tolerance for risk, and, frankly, your willingness to unclog a drain at 2 AM.

REITs vs. Rental Property: Which is Better for Long-Term Investors?

The Core Difference: Ownership vs. Partnership

When you invest in physical rental property, you are the boss. You bought the asset, you manage the repairs, you screen the tenants, and you collect the rent. This level of control is deeply satisfying for some and deeply burdensome for others.

When you buy a REIT (which is essentially a company that owns and often operates income-producing real estate), you are buying a share of that business. You become a passive partner.

This difference in involvement is the fundamental dividing line between the two options. I personally prefer being hands-off with my core retirement accounts, which is where REITs shine, but I prefer the higher level of control—and potential upside—that comes with direct ownership for my primary wealth-building ventures.

Factor REITs (Passive Investment) Rental Properties (Active/Managed Investment)
Management Burden Zero. Professional teams handle everything from tenant placement to roof replacement. High, unless you hire a property manager (which cuts into your profit).
Time Commitment Low. Buy it and forget it. Significant (or costly). Maintenance calls, vacancy marketing, accounting.
Control None. You trust the management team’s decisions. Full control over renovations, tenant standards, and rent setting.

Money Matters: Initial Costs and Liquidity

The barrier to entry is the first practical hurdle any investor faces, and this is where REITs win without question.

Initial Investment

To purchase one share of a listed REIT, you might spend $20 or $100. You can start investing today with the change in your pocket. This is incredibly accessible.

Contrast that with a rental property. You need a large down payment (usually 20–25%), closing costs, inspection fees, and a buffer for immediate repairs. We are talking tens of thousands of dollars, minimum. The initial hurdle for rentals is high, which means many future investors are stuck saving for years just to get started.

Liquidity and Exit Strategy

Liquidity is how quickly you can turn an asset back into cash.

  • REITs: Highly liquid. Since public REITs trade on stock exchanges (like the NYSE), you can sell your shares instantly during market hours. Your cash is available in a matter of days. If you need sudden funds, this liquidity is priceless.
  • Rental Property: Low liquidity. Selling a home involves months of preparation, listing, negotiation, inspections, and closing paperwork. If you need cash fast, you are often forced to take a discount or explore cumbersome financing like a HELOC.

My Takeaway: For younger investors or those building an emergency fund, starting with REITs makes sense because the immediate access to cash protects you from financial emergencies outside of real estate.

The Hidden Power: Leverage and Amplified Returns

Here’s where rental property investors gain a massive advantage that even the highest-performing REITs struggle to match for individual investors: leverage.

When you buy a REIT, you are typically using your own 100% cash investment.

When you buy a rental property, you use a mortgage. This means you are controlling a $300,000 asset by only putting down $60,000 (20% down payment). You are using Other People's Money (OPM) to maximize your potential returns.

This leverage doesn't just increase your potential profit; it amplifies your actual Return on Investment (ROI). For example, if your property value increases by 10% ($30,000 on a $300,000 home), you made a 50% cash return on your initial $60,000 investment. You captured the appreciation on the entire asset, not just the portion you paid for in cash.

While it is true that listed equity REITs have shown higher average net annual returns over a 25-year period (historically around 9.74%) compared to unleveraged private real estate (around 7.66%), these numbers can be misleading. A well-managed, leveraged rental property will often generate an actual cash-on-cash return far exceeding the 9.74% posted by the public market—provided you manage debt wisely.

Leverage cuts both ways, however. It also amplifies losses if the market turns sour or if interest rates are high when you buy. Still, for the long-term, disciplined investor, the strategic use of leverage in rental properties is arguably the single most important tool for building generational wealth.

Tax Talk: Where the Real Money is Made

Let’s be honest: in the world of investments, it’s not just about what you make; it’s about what you keep from the taxman. This is where rental properties hold an undeniable edge.

Rental Property Tax Advantages

As a landlord, you get to deduct significant operating expenses, which include:

  1. Mortgage Interest: Often the largest early deduction.
  2. Property Taxes, Insurance, Repairs, and Management Fees.
  3. Depreciation: This is the superstar. The IRS allows you to deduct a portion of the property's value (excluding land) every year for 27.5 years, acting as a “phantom loss.” You are allowed to report a taxable loss even while the property is generating positive cash flow. This shields cash flow from being taxed until you eventually sell.

Furthermore, direct ownership allows you to potentially use 1031 exchanges to defer capital gains taxes indefinitely when you sell one property and immediately buy another.

REIT Tax Disadvantages

REITs are legally required to distribute at least 90% of their taxable income to shareholders as dividends. While you benefit from high yields, these dividends are typically taxed as ordinary income, which means they are taxed at your highest marginal rate—often significantly higher than long-term capital gains rates.

Yes, there is an advantage known as the Qualified Business Income (QBI) deduction, which currently allows some REIT dividends to temporarily receive a 20% deduction through December 2025, but compared to the cash flow sheltering power of depreciation inherent in direct ownership, rentals maintain a superior tax profile.

Diversification and Volatility

Diversification is key to sleeping well at night.

A good REIT provides instant diversification across:

  • Property Type: Residential, commercial, industrial, healthcare, data centers.
  • Geography: Assets across states or even countries.

If you own a single rental house, you are entirely reliant on one local market. If that market experiences a local economic decline (say, a major employer shuts down), your entire investment is at risk. While you have low geographic diversification with a single rental, you generally experience less volatility because private real estate values move slower than the stock market.

My View: A Real-World Investment Strategy

For those asking which is better, I always respond with a compromise. I’ve found that the best long-term strategy for building durable wealth is a hybrid approach, using each asset class for its respective strength:

  1. Use REITs for Retirement and Passive Income: I allocate REIT funds within tax-advantaged accounts (like an IRA or 401(k)). Their reliable dividends provide income, and their high liquidity means I can rebalance the account easily without dealing with physical asset sales. They are truly hands-off.
  2. Use Rental Property for Wealth Creation and Tax Shelter: I use leveraged rental properties as my primary engine for significant capital growth. The ability to use leverage, depreciation, and 1031 exchanges creates an unparalleled financial opportunity that cannot be replicated by simply buying stocks. I am willing to hire a property manager to handle the day-to-day headaches because the tax and leverage advantages outweigh the management cost.

My personal experience tells me that while the convenience of REITs is unmatched, the control you gain from physical ownership—choosing your exact neighborhood, upgrading strategically, and maximizing tax deductions—allows you to squeeze more profit from the physical real estate asset than you can from pooling your capital with thousands of other investors in a trust.

Summary Comparison for Long-Term Investors

Feature Choose REITs If… Choose Rental Properties If…
Capital You have limited savings and need a low entry point. You have significant capital available for a down payment (or can partner up).
Involvement You demand a 100% passive, hands-off approach. You prefer direct control and are willing to manage assets (or pay a manager).
Risk Profile You need high liquidity and diversification across numerous sectors. You want to maximize returns using mortgage leverage.
Financial Goal You prioritize receiving consistent, easily accessible dividends. You prioritize long-term appreciation, wealth preservation, and tax avoidance.

For serious long-term investors, the choice ultimately comes down to activity level. If you are prepared to put in the work—or the expense of professional management—the superior tax benefits and the power of leverage make rental properties the engine of choice for maximized long-term wealth, even if historically, the raw average annual return percentage of listed public REITs has sometimes been slightly higher due to inherent market volatility. They both have a place at the table, but they serve different long-term objectives.

🏡 Which Turnkey Property Would YOU Purchase?

Saint Louis, MO
🏠 Property: Lewis Place
🛏️ Beds/Baths: 5 Bed • 3 Bath • 3006 sqft
💰 Price: $275,000 | Rent: $2,500
📊 Cap Rate: 8.8% | NOI: $2,020
📅 Year Built: 1895
📐 Price/Sq Ft: $92
🏙️ Neighborhood: C+

VS

Port Charlotte, FL
🏠 Property: Aldridge Ave
🛏️ Beds/Baths: 3 Bed • 2 Bath • 1548 sqft
💰 Price: $339,900 | Rent: $2,195
📊 Cap Rate: 5.8% | NOI: $1,643
📅 Year Built: 2025
📐 Price/Sq Ft: $220
🏙️ Neighborhood: A+

Two contrasting investments: historic St. Louis charm with high cap rate vs modern Florida build with stability. Which fits YOUR investment strategy?

📈 Choose Your Winner & Contact Us Today!

Talk to a Norada investment counselor (No Obligation):

(800) 611-3060

Contact Us Now 

Want Stronger Returns? Invest Where the Housing Market’s Growing

Turnkey rental properties in fast-growing housing markets offer a powerful way to generate passive income with minimal hassle.

Work with Norada Real Estate to find stable, cash-flowing markets beyond the bubble zones—so you can build wealth without the risks of ultra-competitive areas.

🔥 HOT NEW LISTINGS JUST ADDED! 🔥

Talk to a Norada investment counselor today (No Obligation):

(800) 611-3060

Get Started Now

Also Read:

Single-Family vs. Townhome: Which is the Real Cash Flow Winner for Investors?

by

If you’re serious about building wealth through rental properties, you’ve probably spent hours staring at listings, running numbers, and trying to decide: Do I go for the big, classic Single-Family Home (SFH), or do I lean into the efficiency of a townhome? This isn’t just a philosophical debate; it's a cold, hard math problem.

Single-Family vs. Townhome: Which is the Real Cash Flow Winner for Investors?

When we look strictly at the question of single-family home vs. townhome—specifically in terms of which yields better cash flow—my experience suggests that townhomes often deliver higher immediate gross cash flow due to their lower entry price. However, single-family homes tend to provide more reliable and stronger net cash flow over the long term, assuming capital expenditures are managed wisely. Ultimately, it comes down to control, predictability, and those sneaky monthly fees that can eat into returns.

I’ve owned both types of properties across several different markets, and what I’ve learned is that the difference between these two asset classes is far more complex than just comparing the monthly rent amount. It touches on financing, maintenance control, and most importantly, the psychological toll of unexpected bills. Let’s break down where the real money is made—or lost—in each investment type.

Why We Need to Talk About Net Cash Flow, Not Just Rent

When new investors talk about cash flow, they often get excited about the Gross Rent Multiplier or the high monthly rent check. But that initial rent check is just the starting point. The real game is net cash flow. This is the money left over after every expense is paid.

Think of it this way: a townhome might rent for $1,800, and a single-family home down the street might rent for $2,200. On the surface, the SFH looks better. But what if the SFH costs $300,000 and the townhome costs $200,000? Suddenly, the townhome requires less money down and produces a higher return relative to its cost. That’s the Rent-to-Value (RTV) ratio at work.

However, the townhome has an unavoidable $350 monthly Homeowners Association (HOA) fee, while the SFH has zero. Now, that initial cash flow advantage for the townhome starts to crumble.

To truly compare these two options, we must look at the following components of Net Cash Flow:

  1. Mortgage Payments: (Principal, Interest, Taxes, Insurance – PITI)
  2. Operational Expenses: (Repairs, Management Fees, Utilities if applicable)
  3. Capital Expenses (CapEx) Reserves: (Money set aside for future big repairs like roofs, HVAC)
  4. HOA Fees/Special Assessments: (The big differentiator)

The Single-Family Home (SFH) Investment Profile

Investing in SFHs is the classic real estate move for a reason. They offer the highest degree of control, which is the key to predictable cash flow.

Cash Flow Characteristic: Slower Start, Stronger Legs

The primary challenge with SFHs is the high entry barrier. They usually cost significantly more than an equivalent townhome in the same area. This means you need a larger down payment, which drags down your initial Cash-on-Cash Return.

However, once you are past that initial hurdle, the cash flow tends to be incredibly steady. Why? Because you are responsible for everything, which means you set the budget for maintenance.

Key Advantages for SFH Cash Flow:

  • Insurance Savings: While you pay 100% of the property insurance, you are not paying into a separate, often overpriced, HOA master policy.
  • Appreciation & Equity: SFHs generally appreciate faster because the tenant is renting both the structure and the land. Land appreciates; buildings depreciate. This stable equity build-up provides a strong safety net for refinancing or selling later.
  • Maintenance Control: When the roof leaks, I call my roofer, not a slow-moving HOA board. This control minimizes downtime and prevents expensive, unplanned special assessments from hitting my reserves.

Where cash flow gets hit hardest with an SFH is during turnover. When a roof, HVAC system, or water heater goes out, it’s 100% your responsibility, and that single event can wipe out an entire year’s worth of cash flow. This is why disciplined CapEx saving is non-negotiable for SFHs. I typically budget 10% of gross rent for annual repairs and maintenance, plus an additional $200-$300 per month for CapEx reserves on major systems.

The Townhome Investment Profile

Townhomes, typically attached structures that share at least one wall, are often the darling of investors with smaller capital pools. They offer a fantastic entry point into specific neighborhoods that might otherwise be too expensive for a detached home.

Cash Flow Characteristic: High Immediate Yield, High Fee Volatility

Because a townhome costs less than a comparable SFH, the RTV ratio is often highly favorable. If you can buy a $250,000 townhome that rents for $1,800, that looks great compared to a $400,000 SFH that rents for $2,200. Your initial cash-on-cash return will likely be higher on the townhome.

But there is a cash flow predator lurking in the shadows: The HOA Conundrum.

The Problem with the HOA Fee:

The HOA fee is the single biggest threat to sustainable townhome cash flow. When I analyze a townhome deal, I treat the HOA fee as a non-negotiable, fixed operational cost that offers zero tax benefit (unlike mortgage interest or property taxes).

The HOA fee covers external maintenance (roofs, siding, common areas, sometimes water/trash). This sounds great because it shifts the burden of CapEx. However, you are losing control and introducing unpredictability.

Cash Flow Hurdle Description Impact on Net Cash Flow
Rising Fees HOAs raise fees annually, often matching inflation or more. You cannot raise the rent fast enough to always cover these unpredictable hikes. Eats into monthly net profit.
Special Assessments If the HOA reserve fund is poorly managed or a catastrophic event occurs (like the need for an entire community roof replacement), the HOA can levy a massive, one-time bill (e.g., $5,000 to $20,000). Can instantly erase years of positive cash flow.
Rental Restrictions Many HOAs cap the number of units that can be rented out. If the cap is full, you cannot rent your unit, leading to zero cash flow and a massive liability. Risk of total rental income loss.

In my experience, SFH repairs are predictable and manageable through disciplined saving. Townhome special assessments are financial hand grenades—they detonate without warning and are non-negotiable.

Deep Dive: The Hidden Costs That Steal Cash Flow

To truly compare the net cash flow of both property types, we have to look past the rent and the mortgage payment and focus on the less obvious operational expenses.

1. Insurance Costs: The Policy Split

For an SFH, you purchase one master insurance policy (HO-3), covering the structure, liability, and contents. Simple.

For a townhome, insurance often splits into two parts:

  1. Master Policy (HOA): Covers the exterior structure, roof, and common areas. You pay for this through your HOA dues.
  2. H0-6 Policy (Investor): Covers the interior “walls-in,” your liability, and your tenant’s belongings (if applicable).

If the HOA’s master policy has a high deductible (say, $10,000), and a minor roof leak happens, the HOA might refuse to pay, leaving you stuck with the repair bill. If your investor policy covers things the HOA thought they covered, you might be double-paying. I always spend extra time reviewing the HOA master policy documents; ignoring them is the fastest way to invite negative cash flow surprises.

2. Vacancy Rates and Tenant Profile

Cash flow stops dead when a unit is vacant. While both property types can attract quality tenants, the turnover frequency often differs.

SFH tenants tend to be long-term renters (families, those with pets, or people who want a yard). They are generally willing to sign multi-year leases, which provides unparalleled cash flow security.

Townhome tenants often include young professionals, couples, or downsizers. While great tenants, they might be more transient, often moving after 12 to 18 months. Higher turnover means more maintenance costs, more downtime, and therefore, lower total annual cash flow.

The Golden Ratio: When Townhomes Win the Initial Battle

There is one area where the townhome unequivocally shines: the Return on Investment (ROI) for limited capital.

Let’s say you have $70,000 to invest.

  • You could maybe buy one SFH, but you might need to use that capital for the down payment, closing costs, and leaving almost nothing for reserves.
  • You could potentially buy two townhomes, splitting the capital across two lower-priced units.

Diversification is a cash flow guard. If one townhome unit sits vacant for two months, you still have rent coming in from the second unit. If your single SFH sits vacant, your cash flow is zero. This factor is crucial for new investors prioritizing diversification and high immediate cash-on-cash return.

Comparison Point Single-Family Home (SFH) Townhome
Initial Cost Higher Lower
Immediate Cash Flow (Gross) Lower RTV Ratio Higher RTV Ratio (often)
Long-Term Net Cash Flow More predictable and stable Highly susceptible to HOA/Assessments
Maintenance Control 100% Control (Highest CapEx burden) Shared Control (Lower personal CapEx, higher fee risk)
Tenant Stability Typically longer tenancy (good for cash flow) Shorter tenancy common (higher turnover)
Exit Strategy Better long-term appreciation potential Higher liquidity (easier to sell quickly)

My Personal Take: When Does One Outshine the Other?

When deciding between these two property types, I don't look at which one always yields better cash flow; I look at which one provides better cash flow relative to my investment goals.

Choose the Single-Family Home if:

  • You have a higher budget and are focused on long-term wealth building through equity and depreciation benefits.
  • You prioritize control and predictability. You would rather have a large, planned expense ($15,000 for a new roof) than a sudden, unplanned assessment ($8,000 levied by an HOA).
  • Your strategy relies on attracting and retaining long-term tenants.

Choose the Townhome if:

  • You have limited capital and need the highest immediate cash-on-cash return to reinvest quickly.
  • You prefer a more hands-off investment where exterior maintenance is handled (even if you pay for it via fees).
  • The HOA is very well managed with high reserves, low fees, and proven stability—a rare but powerful combination.

Ultimately, cash flow success rests on the foundation of minimizing unpredictable risk. Because the Single-Family Home allows me to directly manage my expenses and maintenance timeline, eliminating the financial chaos of external fees and assessments, I firmly believe it offers a better path for sustainable, long-term net cash flow generation. The slightly lower immediate yield is a small price to pay for that level of financial control and peace of mind. You are the boss, and in real estate investing, the boss gets to choose the budget.

The Ultimate Guide to Passive Real Estate Investing

Download Your FREE Guide to Passive Real Estate Wealth

Real estate investing has created more millionaires than any other path—and this guide shows you how to start or scale with turnkey rental properties.

Inside, you’ll learn how to analyze cash flow and returns, choose the best markets, and secure income-generating deals—perfect for building long-term wealth with minimal hassle.

🔥 FREE DOWNLOAD AVAILABLE NOW! 🔥

Download

Single-Family vs. Townhome: Which Delivers Stronger Cash Flow?

Both property types offer unique advantages—but smart investors are comparing HOA fees, tenant demand, and maintenance costs to find the better-performing asset.

Norada Real Estate helps you analyze cash flow potential across markets—so you can choose the right property type for your goals and build passive income with confidence.

🔥 HOT NEW LISTINGS JUST ADDED! 🔥

Talk to a Norada investment counselor today (No Obligation):

(800) 611-3060

Get Started Now

Recommended Read:

Why Cash Flow Alone Isn’t Enough to Get Rich?

by

Don't get me wrong. Cash flow is good (assuming it's positive), but absolutely NO one has ever become rich from cash flow alone. Think about that for a minute.

Let’s look at a quick example. Let’s say you have a $100,000 property that generates $200 per month in positive cash flow. That’s $200 per month after all your expenses and debt service. That would give you $2,400 per year or $12,000 over five years in cash flow.

Assuming you follow our advice of maintaining a reserve account for each of your properties to cover future maintenance and repairs, you will have made $12,000 in net profit over those five years. This assumes that nothing unforeseen happens along the way such as a hot water tank or leaky roof requiring replacement, or a long-term vacancy.

If you’re going to put your investment capital, credit, and possibly your income at “risk” for $12,000, then you’ll need more than just cash flow to make it worthwhile. You need to be investing in markets that offer good appreciation potential. That is how you become rich!

Live where you want and invest only where the numbers make sense! This stresses the importance of investing in good markets and good neighborhoods.

Going back to our example above, what would happen if we averaged only 5% appreciation per year in addition to the $2,400 in cash flow? (Remember that the national average has been 6.2% going as far back as the 1940s.)

With only 5% appreciation per year you’d make over two (2) times more money in equity than cash flow alone. And with a 10% average rate of appreciation over five years you’d make over five (5) times more money in equity than cash flow alone.

Did you forget that appreciation in many markets used to be over 10% as recently as four years ago? Markets move in cycles and appreciation always happens as markets cycle off their bottoms. We are seeing it today in markets all around the country.

Of course, in addition to the positive cash flow and money made through appreciation, you also benefit from the amortization of the mortgage and the tax benefits through depreciation, tax deferred exchanges and lower capital gains when holding your property for more than a year and a day.

Now is the time to be investing with so many markets near their cyclical bottom or turning back up. Cash flow is great, and it’s the “glue” that keeps your investment together, but it’s the equity growth that will make you rich.

Why Cash Flow Alone Isn't Enough to Get Rich

  • Limited Growth Potential: Cash flow provides a steady income stream, but the amount typically increases slowly over time due to rent control or gradual market adjustments. This can make it difficult to achieve financial independence or aggressive wealth building goals solely through cash flow.
  • Inflation Risk: Inflation erodes the buying power of your cash flow over time. A $200 monthly profit today won't hold the same value in ten years. This means your cash flow won't provide the same level of financial security in the future.

Appreciation: The Engine of Wealth

  • Exponential Growth: Property value appreciation can snowball over time. Even a modest 5% annual increase can significantly boost your equity and overall wealth. Imagine a $100,000 property appreciating by 5% every year for a decade. That translates to a $50,000 increase in equity, outpacing any cash flow generated during that period.
  • Leveraging Debt: Real estate allows you to leverage debt (mortgage) to acquire assets. As property value rises, the loan amount stays fixed, increasing your return on investment (ROI). This magnifies the gains from appreciation compared to a straight cash purchase.

Beyond Cash Flow and Appreciation

  • Tax Advantages: Real estate offers various tax benefits, including depreciation deductions, which lower your taxable income. These deductions can be a significant advantage over other asset classes. Additionally, deferring capital gains taxes through strategies like 1031 exchanges allows you to reinvest profits and accelerate wealth creation. By utilizing these tax benefits, you keep more of your returns working for you.
  • Hedge Against Inflation: Unlike cash flow, which suffers from inflation, real estate can act as a hedge against inflation. Historically, property values tend to rise alongside inflation, helping to preserve your purchasing power over time.

Building a Well-Rounded Strategy

  • Market Research: Investing in “good markets” with high appreciation potential is crucial. Research local trends, job growth, and development plans. Look for areas with strong economic fundamentals that can support rising property values. But remember, appreciation isn't guaranteed. A balanced approach considers both potential appreciation and steady cash flow to generate income while you wait for the market to upswing.
  • Diversification: Don't put all your eggs in one basket. Diversify your portfolio across different property types (residential, commercial), locations, and asset classes to mitigate risk. This could involve a mix of single-family homes, apartment buildings, or even investing in REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts). Consider factors like investment horizon, budget, and risk tolerance when making these decisions.
  • Professional Guidance: Consider seeking advice from experienced real estate professionals like agents, brokers, or financial advisors. They can help you navigate the complexities of the market, identify suitable investment opportunities, and develop a personalized strategy aligned with your goals. Don't hesitate to interview multiple professionals to find one who understands your investment philosophy and risk tolerance.

By focusing on appreciation alongside cash flow and incorporating tax benefits and diversification, you can develop a well-rounded real estate investment strategy with the potential for substantial wealth creation. This approach offers the potential for both steady income, long-term capital gains, and protection against inflation, all while mitigating risk through careful market research and portfolio diversification. Remember, real estate is a complex asset class, and success requires ongoing education, due diligence, and potentially the help of qualified professionals.

Build Wealth with More Than Just Cash Flow

Relying on cash flow alone isn’t enough to build real wealth. Smart investors know that long-term appreciation, tax advantages, and leverage are just as critical.

Norada helps you invest in markets with strong growth potential, solid rental income, and built-in equity—so you grow wealth from multiple angles.

HOT NEW LISTINGS JUST ADDED!

Talk to a Norada investment counselor today (No Obligation):

(800) 611-3060

Get Started Now 

20 Best Markets for Buying Single Family Rentals

by

Best-of-the-BestWhile buying single family rental properties has become the darling investment strategy of Wall Street, it may not always make sense for individual real estate investors — particularly in some markets already picked over by the large institutional investors. But there are still markets where the numbers work for the conservative, individual investor looking to purchase foreclosures and other homes as single family investment properties.

[Read more…]

The Investing Pyramid

by

There are three major areas when it comes to real estate investing.  Each of these can be seen as the corner of a triangle as shown here.

It's important to understand these three major areas and the relationship among them.

The first corner of real estate investing is called creating cash. This is where you use real estate to generate chunks of cash or regular cash flow from your income property.

Chunks of cash represent the type of profit made when assigning a contract to another investor or fixing and flipping a property for a larger profit. Depending on the price point of the properties you’re assigning or flipping, you can earn some good money in a relatively short period of time. This often makes for great supplementary income.

In fact, some investors make a living doing nothing more than using real estate to create chunks of cash. Creating cash in this manner is great, but it rarely leads to true wealth; that is, building up your net worth.

[Read more…]

Blog Posts

Contact

Norada Real Estate Investments 30251 Golden Lantern, Suite E-261 Laguna Niguel, CA 92677

(949) 218-6668
(800) 611-3060
BBB