Archives for July 2009

New Dallas Investment Property

by

We are pleased to announce our second offering within the great state of Texas.

Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, San Antonio and the state capital, Austin, make up what many call the Texaplex: a densely packed triangle with each side measuring about 300 miles.  This triangle is home to roughly 80% of the state's population of 24 million people (second only to California's 37 million).  It also containing America's third-largest airport (Dallas-Fort Worth, aka DFW) and its second-busiest sea port, Houston, (despite being 50 miles inland).

Dallas offers investors a very stable housing market that has weathered the housing bubble of years past. The Case-Shiller home price index recently reported that Dallas home prices rose 1.9% between April and May 2009.  This was the second highest price increase behind Cleveland real estate market for the same period.

There is a fantastic 10-page special report in the July 11th, 2009 issue of The Economist. that covered the Texas market along with the many benefits it offers it's residents and businesses.  The same benefits that are attracting new migrants from all over the U.S. You can read the article online here: Texas Special Report.

Our new Dallas investment properties offer investors strong cash flow with capitalization rates from 7.5% to 9.0%.  First year ROI starts at 115%, both assuming a 20% down payment. . There is also strong appreciation potential given the dormant state the Dallas real estate market has had over the years coupled with the current growth in jobs and population.

Find out more about our current investment opportunities by clinking the links below:

Dallas Investment Property  [Single Family Homes]

Dallas Investment Property  [3-Bedroom Duplexes]

Why Housing Prices Are Essentially Meaningless

by

It took the Wall Street Journal an entire survey to prove what readers of this column have known for months: The housing recovery, as it plays out, will be a localized event, varying greatly city to city, neighborhood to neighborhood, street to street.

The Journal, god bless them, compiled housing data to compare inventory changes, months supply, price drops, unemployment, and default rates across 28 US metro areas. Unsurprisingly, bubble markets like Las Vegas, Phoenix, and Miami look particularly horrid, whereas areas like Dallas (which avoided much of the housing mania) and cities like Charlotte and Seattle (which are just now seeing price declines accelerate) appear to be holding up rather nicely.

But drilling deeper into the raw data reveals a housing market that's deeply bifurcated, even within individual cities.

As low-end markets experience a sharp increase in buying activity due to supply shortages and vastly lower prices, illiquid high end markets are experiencing violent price swings — typically in the southward direction. This much is already known, and the Journal's study simply shows what we're told ad nauseam: is, in fact, local.

What's far more applicable to home buyers and sellers around the country, however, isn't what a few broad (yet important) data points show about what's happening in a few hundred neighborhoods all lumped together. Instead, it's where individual submarkets are headed. After all, owning a home is an investment in a neighborhood, a street, a community — not necessarily a metropolitan area at large.

Housing prices, by extension — when measured as broadly as a metro area — are basically meaningless.

[Read more…]

Commercial Real Estate – The Next Shoe to Drop

by

I don't know if the real estate bubble is done popping. I suspect it is not.

If there is another shoe waiting to drop on the U.S. economy, its commercial real estate. Bloomberg reports that $165 billion in commercial real estate loans mature this year. They must be refinanced or sold. Either way, it seems like some losses must be taken.

As of July 8, 2009, $108 billion worth of properties were in default, foreclosure or bankruptcy. That's a lot. Throw in the 22-year high of vacant apartments, and you get a picture where landlords are really struggling.

Goldman Sachs took $700 million in losses from commercial real estate in the last quarter. And it did so without a hiccup. And we have the various government bailout programs to thank for that. Without the government sponsored ability to earn their way out of this mess, that $700 million could've been a much bigger deal.

The one hope regarding commercial real estate is that the problem is pretty well known. And so far, it's not moving the stock market.

Bloomberg threw out some big numbers for regional commercial real estate debt that was due in June. $463 million worth of office loans in Houston, $986 million in industrial mortgages in Portland, Oregon, $96 million in retail property in Orlando.

Was this debt paid? Was it refinanced? Is it in default? We don't yet know. And we won't know for up to 90 days, which is a typical grace period. It will be a while before we know whether these loans will become losses.

Beyond Subprime in the Mortgage Market Meltdown

by

During the housing mania, it seemed that the majority of the United States suffered from a mass delusion. They believed their properties would always go up in price, but their mortgage payments wouldn't follow suit.

We have mountains of debt to work through yet. The last bubble was one for the ages. We've all heard stories of one kind or another…

There was the glass cutter who earned $5,000 per month, pretax. WaMu gave him a $615,000 home loan with payments of $3,600 per month.

There was a house – a shack, really – that appraised for $132,000 and got a mortgage of $103,000. The owner hadn't worked in 13 years. Upon foreclosure, a neighbor bought the house and paid $18,000 just to tear the thing down.

And the most eye-popping of all: A house in Fort Myers that sold for $399,600 on Dec. 29, 2005 – only to sell for $589,900 on Dec. 30, 2005.

America, it seems, just went crazy – borrowers, lenders, nearly everybody. These anecdotes and others are told in a new book titled More Mortgage Meltdown by money managers Whitney Tilson and Glenn Tongue.

But what caused the mania and how we got there is less to the point than what happens from here.

“If the problems in the mortgage market were limited to subprime loans, then the carnage would be mostly behind us,” the authors note. Subprime loans were the riskiest mortgage loans. Prime loans were where the borrower made a substantial down payment and had good credit history. Subprime loans, by contrast, were to borrowers of poor credit quality and spotty job histories.

The bigger problem is that the mortgage bubble infected a number of areas beyond just subprime. The subprime crisis was the first to drop, like a marathon dancer that falls to the floor exhausted. But there are still other dancers on the floor ready to topple over too.

Take a look at this next chart, which has gained some currency in the worried circles of financial people. It's worth a bit of study. It shows you the other dancers on the floor.

[Read more…]

Why Real Estate is Still a Good Investment

by

Now that the housing bubble has crashed, a growing number of academics, journalists, and financial gurus are trying to reassess the value of real estate as a long-term investment class.

There is a growing — and much needed — consensus that much of the conventional wisdom about real estate as a “great investment” is over-hyped and oversold by the National Association of Realtors who also happen to be a powerful lobbying group, dictating our national housing policy.

The Wall Street Journal's Cheapskate columnist looks at housing and reaches a good conclusion (subscription required), explaining that the real financial return of homeownership comes from not having to pay rent: “That's why you should buy as much home as you need — but no more. A bigger home than you need isn't an investment — it's an extravagance, the equivalent of renting a bigger apartment than you need. You may choose to do so, but that doesn't make it a smart move financially.”

Unfortunately though, Cheapskate also makes a key math error in calculating the return on his over the years: “When I constructed a very basic cash-flow model for our home-buying history-selling price minus purchase price, renovations and repairs — it showed a roughly 3.5% annualized return on investment, from 1991 through the summer of last year.”

[Read more…]